The Constitutional Architecture of the Economic Governance in the EU
Workshop
The Constitutional Architecture of the Economic Governance in the EU
Venerdì, 23 marzo 2012
Co-sponsored by
- European Union Democracy Observatory on Institutional Change and Reforms
- Center for Studies on Federalism
- STALS
- Centro Studi sul Parlamento, Luiss Guido Carli
Co-organized by Giuseppe Martinico, Centre for Studies on Federalism, Turin - CEPC, Madrid
Bruno de Witte, EUI and Maastricht University
Where:
Seminar Room, Villa Malafrasca
via Boccaccio, 151 – Firenze
Work Language:
English
Overview
The package included in the “Statement by the Euro area heads of State or government” - issued at the end of the European Council held in Brussels on December 9, 2011- proposed a set of measures designed to face the financial crisis: a reinforced architecture for the economic and monetary Union, the strengthening of stabilisation tools, the acceleration of the entry into force of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) treaty, a stronger policy coordination and governance and, above all, the creation of a new fiscal compact.
The aim of this workshop is to offer a multidisciplinary reflection upon the current crises faced by the EU and the solutions proposed by the European leaders. We use “crises” instead of “crisis” because it is evident that the EU is experiencing a legitimacy crisis which goes beyond the more general economic and financial difficulties affecting the global system. In order to favour a rigorous debate on several issues which we consider fundamental, this workshop will be divided into three panels devoted to the impact of the crises on the “domestic” and supranational levels. Given the highly interdisciplinary content of the subject, we extended the invitation to scholars from different backgrounds who could address such complex issues from different angles.
In the course of the workshop we would like to address inter alia the following questions:
• Many thought that the Lisbon treaty would be the last one for a long time. Now, instead, it seems old and unable to face the challenges of the crises. What are the competences, powers and institutional mechanisms the EU still needs?
• The relevance of the euro and the different level of integration between the Eurozone countries and the other EU members seemingly indicate the need for a multi-speed or multi-tiered EU. What kind of institutional arrangements can be put in place? Can asymmetry represent a solution for the EU?
• The EU is struggling with its own constitutional limits, putting pressure on national institutions and actors (see the Greek and Italian cases that are emblematic from this point of view): Does this increase or decrease EU legitimacy?
• Against this background, what role can be played by national institutions (i.e. Parliaments, Governments and Courts)?
Per ulteriori informazioni: Giuseppe Martinico Questo indirizzo email è protetto dagli spambots. È necessario abilitare JavaScript per vederlo.